

An amazing tale of life and it's idiosyncrasies
A fantastic scenario with a built-in believability

Too much work for crockery-type cooksHEARTLAND COOKERY has a very broad range of recipes, many of them very creative and unusual...some to the point that I wouldn't be drawn to them for standard cooking, much less for the slow cooker. The biggest drawback for me, though, is this: Most of the recipes in the book require what seems to me an enormous amount of prep--or at least, more than I want to put in--before you even get NEAR the Crock Pot.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the basic psychology of those who want to use the slow cooker is generally that they want to be able to get up in the morning, throw some stuff in the pot, and come home to a savory meal ready to be ladled out onto some rice or noodles. I don't think most of us want to spend 30-45 mins of prep to do that. 15-20 mins is kind of my max....
I don't dispute that these are fine recipes that you might be proud to place on your table. I just don't think they match up with the needs of the typical Crock Pot user...or at least, they don't match my own expectations.
My Favorite Cookbook Ever!!
I use this cookbook quite frequently

Yummy!!

A worthy commentaryThough Marshall denies Pauline authorship, his arguments, as aforementioned by a fellow reviewer, are not convincing (though exhaustive of the issues confronting authorship.) A rather remarkable approach, Marshall places Titus at the front of the commentary in a bold step to bring to the face a usually neglected book. The commentary is better for this practice.
Having used Knight, Mounce, Quinn and Wacker, Debellious and Counzelmann, and several other competent commentaries in a exegesis course on the Pastoral Epistles, Marhsall's commentary was a steadfast primary resource in my studies. Though the pastor not educated in languages will not be able to follow this commentary easily, the educated clergy will find it invaluable in their pursuits of exegesis and exposition from the PE. Marshall has given us a staple for NT scholarship.
Detailed, Readable, LucidOne of the negative aspects of this work (in my view), is Marshall's denial of Pauline authorship. I found his arguments unconvincing (especially after reading Knight and Mounce on Pauline authorship of the PE), and it seems to me that Marshall is too inclined to accept the consensus of liberal scholarship on this matter (e.g., Dibelius and Conzelmann).
Nevertheless, there is much gold to be mined in this work. Dr. Marshall is a brilliant man who is obviously "mighty in the scriptures." The introduction is excellent and the exegesis is thorough and lucid. If you can afford it, you should get it and use it along with Knight, Mounce and Fee.
Dr. Marshall tells us in his preface; "The chief aim has been the understanding of the flow of the argument and the exposition of the theology which it enshrines, so that the message of the letters emerges with all desirable clarity. At the same time I have commented in some detail on Greek syntax for the benefit of students who may appreciate all the help that they can get with the text. Organising the mass of material in what is now called a user-friendly manner has not been easy...."
Well, I am grateful for Dr. Marshall's successful effort. This is a work that abounds with careful thought and helpful insights. I must rank it along side of Knight and Mounce.
Long Awaited and Masterful

Come On.
Poorly done, especially after taking the code apart
Not Bad



